Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 7493

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2023 | Month : December | Volume : 17 | Issue : 12 | Page : QR01 - QR04 Full Version

Acute Fatty Liver of Pregnancy- A Case Series from a Tertiary Hospital of Kolkata, India: A Case Series


Published: December 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/65374.18786
Madhulima Saha, Raju Agarwal, Sharad Srivastava, Aditya Joshi

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Command Hospital (Eastern Command), Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 2. Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Command Hospital (Eastern Command), Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, Command Hospital (Eastern Command), Kolkata, West Bengal, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Command Hospital (Eastern Command), Kolkata, West Bengal, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Madhulima Saha,
Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Command Hospital, Near ECHS Polyclinic, Judges Court Road, Alipore, Kolkata-700027, West Bengal, India.
E-mail: madhulima.saha@gmail.com

Abstract

Acute Fatty Liver of Pregnancy (AFLP) is a rare, life-threatening complication of pregnancy that affects women in the third trimester or immediate postpartum period. Although the exact pathogenesis is poorly understood, it has been linked to a deficiency in Long Chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA Dehydrogenase (LCHAD) in foetal fatty acid metabolism. The early diagnosis of AFLP can sometimes be challenging due to overlapping features with severe preeclampsia, Haemolysis Elevated Liver Enzymes, Low Platelet (HELLP) syndrome, viral hepatitis, and cholestasis of pregnancy. It is a diagnosis of exclusion when no other known liver diseases are present in the mother. Herein, the authors presented a case series of four cases of AFLP, including their chief complaints, clinicopathological findings, management, and outcomes. Early diagnosis, termination of pregnancy, and multidisciplinary management in the post-delivery period are crucial for improving foetomaternal prognosis.

Keywords

Disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, Elevated liver enzymes, Low platelets (HELLP), Long chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase, Multiple organ dysfunction

The AFLP is a rare obstetric emergency characterised by acute liver dysfunction or failure during pregnancy, with a high chances of foetomaternal morbidity and mortality. However, global outcomes have improved due to early diagnosis and timely delivery of the foetus. The incidence of AFLP is estimated to be one in 5,000-20,000 pregnancies (1). The pathogenesis of AFLP is still poorly understood. The most significant metabolic defect in the foetus is the recessively inherited deficiency of LCHAD. Non metabolised fatty acids from the foetal circulation re-enter the maternal circulation through the placenta and accumulate in haepatocytes, leading to lipotoxicity (2). It has been observed that mothers with fatty liver of pregnancy often have LCHAD-deficient children with Reye-like syndrome (2),(3). Some identified high-risk factors for AFLP include primigravida, male foetus, previous history of AFLP, and multiple gestation (4).

Case Report

Case 1

A 29-year-old multipara at 29+5 weeks of gestation presented with progressive nausea/vomiting, high-coloured urine, and yellow discoloration of the eyes for the last seven days. The patient reported no itching or fever and had a previous history of chronic hypertension but was not yet on medication for this pregnancy. Upon examination, patient’s blood pressure was 140/90 mmHg and she exhibited icterus. The size of her gravid uterus was consistent with 28-30 weeks. The liver was not palpable. Laboratory parameters at admission revealed anaemia, leukocytosis, serum bilirubin of 5.92 mg/dL, Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) of 458 IU/L, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) of 502 IU/L, and creatinine of 1.8 mg/dL. Tests for hepatitis A, B, C, and E were negative. The patient was prescribed antibiotics, urodeoxycholic acid tablets, and vitamin K injections. An abdominal ultrasound showed an echogenic liver (Table/Fig 1). Within four days, her bilirubin levels rose to 22.8 mg/dL. The patient gradually developed hypoglycaemia, confusion, drowsiness, and oliguria. Emergency preterm cesarean section was decided upon at 30+3 weeks. The patient delivered a live male foetus weighing 1.05 kg.

In the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), the patient exhibited signs and symptoms of haepatic encephalopathy (grade 2 according to the West Haven classification system) (5), including disorientation, lethargy, hypersomnia, and marked slowing of mental tasks. The patient also had Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) and a haepatic subcapsular bleed, which was managed conservatively. Over the next three days, patient received six units of Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC), 15 units of Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP), 12 units of cryoprecipitate, and two units of Single Donor Platelets (SDP) (Table/Fig 2). Her sensorium, coagulation parameters, liver function, and urine output gradually improved over the course of two weeks. The patient was discharged home on day 30. The Swansea score for this case was 11 (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4).

Case 2

A 24-year-old primigravida with a twin pregnancy at 35+5 weeks presented with yellow discoloration of the eyes, nausea, and abdominal pain persisting for five days. The patient had no previous history of hypertension or liver conditions.

During clinical examination, icterus, a blood pressure of 122/76 mmHg, and a uterus consistent with term size were observed. The patient appeared drowsy and confused. Laboratory investigations revealed serum bilirubin levels of 14.0 mg/dL, ALT levels of 146 U/L, AST levels of 151 U/L, Total Leucocyte Count (TLC) of 16,810 mm3/dL, a prothrombin time of 16 seconds, creatinine levels of 1.7 mg/dL, and blood sugar levels of 40 mg/dL. Tests for hepatitis A, E, B, and C were negative. Abdominal ultrasound indicated a normal liver span and echogenicity. An emergency cesarean section was performed, resulting in the delivery of live twins: a male weighing 1.9 kg and a female weighing 1.8 kg. The patient experienced a blood loss of 1200 mL. The patient was transfused three units of PRBC, 16 units of FFP, six units of cryoprecipitate, and six units of Random Donor Platelets (RDP) over a period of three to four days (Table/Fig 1). On day 3, the patient underwent re-exploratory laparotomy for rectus muscle haematoma. From day 4 onwards, the patient began exhibiting symptoms of haepatic encephalopathy (grade 1 according to the West Haven classification system), including hypersomnia, mild confusion, and slowing of mental tasks (5). The patient was started on syrup lactulose 30 mL three times daily, tab rifaximin 550 mg twice daily, and injection of vitamin K. Gradually, her sensorium and general health improved, and the patient was discharged home on day 21. The Swansea score for this case was 10 (Table/Fig 3).

Case 3

A 21-year-old primigravida at 36w+4 weeks presented with loss of appetite, yellowing of the eyes, and high-coloured urine since four days. During clinical examination, icterus, pedal oedema, and a blood pressure of 146/98 mmHg (the first elevated blood pressure reading of this pregnancy) were observed. The uterus was consistent with term size, and the foetal heart rate was 138/min.

Laboratory parameters showed a haemoglobin level of 10.0 g/dL, WBC count of 17,180 mm3, platelet count of 1.35 lac/mm3, serum bilirubin level of 10.2 mg/dL, AST level of 508 IU/L, ALT level of 645 IU/L, and creatinine level of 1.8 mg/dL. The patient underwent emergency cesarean section the following day due to foetal distress and delivered a male baby weighing 2.0 kg.

Postoperatively, the patient’s condition gradually deteriorated due to haepatic encephalopathy (grade 3 according to the West Haven classification system), characterised by disorientation about time and space, hypersomnia, inability to perform mental tasks, and amnesia. The patient also developed DIC, with her haepatic parameters showing a downward trend over the next several days. She experienced anuria, anasarca, abdominal distension, hypotension, and respiratory distress. She received transfusions of six units of PRBC, 12 units of FFP, 12 units of cryoprecipitate, and six units of RDP. Elective ventilation with vasopressor support and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CCRT) were initiated. Despite prone ventilation, she developed worsening Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). She progressed to Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS) and slipped into a coma. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) was employed in an attempt to manage her condition. However, despite all measures, the patient succumbed to acute liver failure, sepsis, and MODS on day 15 (Table/Fig 2). The Swansea score for this case was 12 (Table/Fig 3).

Case 4

A 42-year-old primigravida with a twin gestation (conceived through IVF) at 32 weeks was referred from one of the North Eastern states. The patient had been experiencing symptoms of nausea, yellow discoloration of the eyes, and loss of appetite for four days. During examination, her blood pressure was normal, deep icterus, and mild pallor was observed. Laboratory investigations revealed a serum bilirubin level of 12.8 mg/dL, AST level of 892 IU/L, ALT level of 1002 IU/L, platelet count of 1.5 lac/mm3, and creatinine level of 1.0 mg/dL. Tests for haepatitis A, E, B, and C were negative. The patient delivered live twin boys weighing 1.5 kg and 1.7 kg via emergency preterm cesarean section. She experienced atonic Postpartum Haemorrhage (PPH) after the cesarean, which did not respond to uterotonics, leading to the performance of a peripartum hysterectomy. Blood loss during the procedure was 1.5 L. The patient received six units of PRBC, four units of FFP, and four units of cryoprecipitate (Table/Fig 2). With gradual improvement, the patient was discharged home on day 20. The Swansea score for this case was 7 (Table/Fig 3).

Discussion

The AFLP is a rare obstetric emergency with features of acute liver dysfunction/failure during pregnancy, which poses a high-risk of morbidity and mortality for both the mother and foetus. However, global outcomes have improved due to early diagnosis and prompt delivery of the foetus. The condition was first described by Sheehan in 1940, and its incidence ranges from one in 5,000 to 20,000 pregnancies (1).

The pathogenesis of AFLP is not well understood. LCHAD deficiency, a recessively inherited metabolic defect, is considered the most important factor in foetal development. Non metabolised fatty acids from the foetal circulation re-enter the maternal circulation through the placenta and accumulate in haepatocytes, leading to lipotoxicity (2). It has been observed that mothers with fatty liver of pregnancy often have children with LCHAD deficiency and Reye-like syndrome (2),(3). Some identified high-risk factors for AFLP include primigravida, male foetus, previous history of AFLP, and multiple gestation (4).

Fatty liver of pregnancy presents with a spectrum of clinical severity. Symptoms may include persistent nausea/vomiting, malaise, anorexia, and progressive jaundice of varying degrees (1). Many patients also exhibit signs and symptoms overlapping with severe preeclampsia, such as hypertension, proteinuria, low platelet count (HELLP syndrome), and oedema. Laboratory parameters typically show hyperbilirubinaemia, elevated liver transaminases, hypoglycaemia, leukocytosis, increased creatinine levels, and prolonged clotting times (4),(6). Profound activation of endothelial cells with capillary leakage can lead to hemodynamic instability, acute kidney injury, ascites, and pulmonary oedema. Decreased uteroplacental flow can also jeopardize foetal well-being (7).

Due to its relative rarity, there have been few large case series reported in the literature. Liu G et al., described a series of 15 patients over a period of 10 years and concluded that early diagnosis and prompt delivery can improve prognosis (4). The Swansea diagnostic criteria, developed by Ch’ng CL et al., in 2002 at Swansea NHS Trust hospitals, are widely used worldwide for the diagnosis of AFLP since their proposal [6-8]. The clinical presentation and laboratory findings of AFLP are vague and non specific, which poses a diagnostic challenge (1). A case reported by Ziki E et al., in 2019 highlighted the importance of timely diagnosis in AFLP to prevent poor maternal outcomes (9). Over the past two decades, the incidence of AFLP and its associated foetomaternal morbidity has decreased due to better knowledge, early diagnosis, and termination of pregnancy (10),(11).

Marked progressive hyperbilirubinaemia, deranged renal function tests, hypoglycaemia with normal platelet count, and elevated serum bile acids should raise suspicion of AFLP and shift focus from HELLP syndrome and cholestasis of pregnancy (10),(12). Liver biopsy was only performed postmortem for one patient in the present study due to coagulopathy issues. The mode of delivery is a dilemma and should be decided based on cervical findings, foetal compromise, coagulation parameters, and the patient’s general condition (7),(11). Management of AFLP requires a multidisciplinary approach and should ideally be done at a tertiary centre. Although the initial postpartum period can be challenging, with good supportive care, most patients show uphill trend. Sivakumar S reported on three cases of AFLP with significant complications due to renal dysfunction, coagulopathy, and encephalopathy. These cases, like present case showed improved outcomes with early diagnosis, delivery of the foetus, and multidisciplinary supportive care (13). Ling W et al., reported a series of three patients who were referred with different complaints, but early suspicion of AFLP and subsequent multidisciplinary management led to positive outcomes (14).

Full clinical recovery from AFLP usually takes several weeks with no long-term sequelae, although histological changes in the liver may persist for months. Patients should be informed about the association between various defects in fatty acid oxidation in offspring and liver disease in the mother. Babies born to mothers with AFLP should be under follow-up (1),(4). Utsa IM et al., reported a series of 14 cases several years ago, with favourable outcomes attributed to early diagnosis and termination of pregnancy (11). The key to early diagnosis lies in maintaining a high index of suspicion and excluding common liver disorders of pregnancy, like viral hepatitis, cholestasis of pregnancy, severe preeclampsia, HELLP syndrome, dengue, and malaria (15),(16).

Conclusion

There are many etiologies for jaundice in pregnancy, but one of the most life-threatening conditions is AFLP. However, due to its rarity, the diagnosis can be missed, leading to high morbidity and mortality among pregnant women, especially in low-resource settings. Therefore, early suspicion and diagnosis, prompt multidisciplinary team management, early termination of pregnancy, and robust intensive care support are crucial for improving foetomaternal outcomes.

References

1.
Joueidi Y, Peoc’h K, Le Lous M, Bouzille G, Rousseau C, Bardou-Jacquet E, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes and prognostic factors in acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:198-205. ISSN 0301- 2115 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.06.052. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Ramanathan R, Ibdah JA. Mitochondrial dysfunction and acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(7):3595. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23073595. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Jamerson PA. Association between acute fatty liver of pregnancy and fatty acid oxidation disorders. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2005;34(1):87-92. Doi: 10.1177/0884217504272800. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Liu G, Shang X, Yuan B, Han C, Wang Y. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: Analysis on the diagnosis and treatment of 15 cases. J Reprod Med. 2016;61(5-6):282- 86. PMID: 27424373.
5.
Weissenborn K. Hepatic encephalopathy: Definition, clinical grading and diagnostic principles. Drugs. 2019;79(Suppl 1):05-09. Doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-1018-z. PMID: 30706420; PMCID: PMC6416238. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Lau HH, Chen YY, Huang JP, Chen CY, Su TH, Chen CP. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy in a taiwanese tertiary care center: A retrospective review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;49(2):156-59. ISSN 1028-4559. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1028-4559(10)60033-2. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Chen J, Huang ZB, Fan XG, Hu XW, Qi M, Liao CJ, et al. Potential predictors for prognosis and postpartum recovery time of acute fatty liver of pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:601. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03287-y. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Ch’ng CL, Morgan M, Hainsworth I, Kingham JG. Prospective study of liver dysfunction in pregnancy in Southwest Wales. Gut. 2002;51(6):876-80. Doi: 10.1136/gut.51.6.876. Erratum in: Gut. 2003;52(2):315. PMID: 12427793; PMCID: PMC1773454. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Ziki E, Bopoto S, Madziyire MG. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: A case report. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:259. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019- 2405-5. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Tan J, Hou F, Xiong H, Pu L, Xiang P, Li C. Swansea criteria score in acute fatty liver of pregnancy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2022;135(7):860-62. Doi: 10.1097/ CM9.0000000000001821. PMID: 35671185; PMCID: PMC9276417. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Usta IM, Barton JR, Amon EA, Gonzalez A, Sibai BM. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: An experience in the diagnosis and management of fourteen cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(5):1342-47. Doi: 10.1016/0002- 9378(94)90158-9. PMID: 7977544. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Zhong Y, Zhu F, Ding Y. Early diagnostic test for acute fatty liver of pregnancy: A retrospective case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-2787-4. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Sivakumar S. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy: Case series report. Indian J Clin Anaesth. 2017;4(2):276-79. Doi: 10.18231/2394-4994.2017.0058.
14.
Ling W, Quan G, Shuguo D, Yun Z, Guoqiang S, Ying L, et al. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy cases in a maternal and child health hospital of China: Three case reports. Medicine. 2020;99(29):e21110.|Doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021110. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Kumari A, Sharma T, Singh S. Liver disorders in pregnancy- A retrospective study. J Clin of Diagn Res. 2022;16(2):QC27-QC31. https://www.doi.org/10.7860/ JCDR/2022/52250/16038.
16.
Brügge M, Pecks U, Iannaccone A, Palz-Fleige M, Stepan H, Tauscher A. Acute fatty liver of pregnancy- Case series. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2023;227(6):466- 73. Doi: 10.1055/a-2096-6230. PMID: 37490932.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/65374.18786

Date of Submission: May 29, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Aug 04, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Oct 06, 2023
Date of Publishing: Dec 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 08, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 22, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 03, 2023 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com